Mercenary for Justice - DVD (Good Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
|
IMDB rating: 4.10 Plot: Seagal plays a CIA covert operative who is forced into helping a team of mercenaries stage a jailbreak for a wealthy client when his best friend’s wife and son are kidnapped by the same mercenaries. All the while the CIA are in pursuit in an attempt to silence Seagal. |
Available versions:
DVD (Good Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
Actors: Seagal Steven,Smith Roger Guenveur,Goss Luke,Williams Michael K.,Galley Adrian,Kirkwood Langley,Bieldt Vivian,Young Bruce,Butler Peter,Valley-Omar Farouk,Mogoje Tumi,Nkweta Zaa,Action,Drama,Thriller,
If Bush REALLY wants Democracy in Iraq, why is he and the state Dept protecting Blackwater?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071126/ap_o n_go_ca_st_pe/state_vs_justice_blackwate r;_ylt=AjnaZeXuSuhk39sHTEp.ps5h24cA
First you have the investigation above that has been stone walled. Then the state dept gives them immunity for killing 17 unarmed Iraqi’s. As a Veteran myself, i feel that the jobs of the private contractors should be either handled by the military, or by contractors at their own risk, subject to local laws. Killing innocent civilians is collateral damage, and is unavoidable by the military. But when contract mercenaries do it, its a poster moment for jihadists. It seems to me a few different generals told Bush we needed more troops. He fired most of them, and ignored them. Could it be we wanted companies like blackwater to profit from war? Could Bush himself be profiting from mercenaries? And how is covering up for a bunch of rouge wannbe soldiers helping to spread democracy in Iraq?
Correct.Because Bush never wanted Democracy in Iraq. Most Iraqis have fled the country, hence violence is down and the "surge is working". War-profiteering is a multi-million dollar business within the Republican Party.
Zinger! | Nov 26, 2007
Plausible deniability
MAGIC 8 BALL | Nov 26, 2007
Because Bush thinks that if he doesn’t protect them he’ll be called a racist since they’ve got ‘Black’ in their name.
trythisagain | Nov 26, 2007
what’s wrong with you? support our death for hire squads
captain_koyk | Nov 26, 2007
He really does not want Democracy anywhere. He works for BIG_OIL inc. Pakistan, Saudi, Kuwait, All of our allies are Kingdoms, not democracies. In fact, America has a record of overthrowing democracies in favor of Dictatorships.
alchemist1959 | Nov 26, 2007
they - and other less mentioned ‘private contractors’- are the hencemen for the NWO- they may the force which is intended to enforce martial law on US soil- and guard the internees at the FEMA camps built of the ex-military bases, since they rightly know regular military won’t.
Kelvinistic | Nov 26, 2007
He undermines the sovereignty of the new Iraqi govt., making them appear to be U.S. puppets.
Reagan’s policy was to know how many troops, etc. were needed for a fight, then he’d insist on employing a force 7x that size. Bush invaded Iraq with the smallest possible force, and allowed the Republican Guard to set down their guns and just walk away, allowing them to fight this insurgency at a later date. Bush is no Reagan, that’s for sure.
CaesarLives | Nov 26, 2007
Public opinion and the corporate media have made up their minds on this one. The total lack of explanations, justifications and/or defenses causes me to wonder what we don’t know.
It’s entirely too easy to just jump on a headline or two and create a case on conjecture. It’s also irresponsible. Most governments use "contractors" for particularly ugly and/or dangerous jobs and so do civilians and dignitaries.
It’s entirely possible that no explanation can or should be given to the general public for national security reasons. Face it, the national news outlets are not exactly responsible with information they DO get straight and CAN’T be trusted with anything that could damage our efforts in the region.
I’m sure to get lots of thumbs-down over giving Blackwater the benefit of the doubt, but I know way too much about similar situations to think it’s as simple as it sounds so far!
Ed Harley | Nov 26, 2007
Add comment November 20th, 2009
Edgar Watson